You're viewing all posts tagged with news

I got into the beta for Newsvine last night. I haven’t played with it too much, but if nothing else it does present a nicer layout than most other wire-service news portals. I’ll leave the full Web 2.0 rant to Zeldman, but I find their use of RSS a little redundant. Sure, I can subscribe to all my news using their feeds, but isn’t Newsvine itself an aggregator? Isn’t it a bit like subscribing to a feed of a feed? Don’t get me wrong, I love my feeds, but I think they have their place. Lately, if it’s a site I’m just going to visit every day anyway, I’ve started unsubscribing to its feed and putting it into my “dailies” folder.

Anyway, I’ll be playing around with Newsvine over the next week or so. If you want an invitation, comment here and I’ll toss you one. If you want to read a preview of it, there’s a good write-up here.

While I’m on the topic of the news, I’d like to point out the lax editorial standard for what constitutes “breaking news” on CNN’s homepage. Today, a bright red banner reads, President Bush’s policy in Iraq is not working, the Iraq Study Group said in releasing its long-awaited report. Important? Yes. Breaking? No. Over Thanksgiving my dad said a friend of his had been in the gym on the treadmill, when the news flashed a “breaking news” bulletin. A few people gathered around the TV, fearing there had been a major disaster somewhere. Instead, the “news” was about a celebrity’s divorce filings.

See also:

  1. The Boy Who Cried Wolf
  2. Breaking News is Broken

Weblogs and the News

I’ve been following the story of James Kim and his family over the past week. CNN has a nice little box at the top of their developing stories that gives you the newest bullet points on a story, which made me remember something I had started thinking about when I was waiting to see if Jim Webb would beat George Allen last month: the use of reverse chronological posts, i.e., the weblog format.

When I know nothing about a given topic, which is most of the time regarding breaking news, I want a well-written article that tells me what’s going on. But when I’m following a developing story, I just want to be able to log in and read the latest, since I already know all the backstory that makes up the bulk of the article. News sites could easily include a sidebar in every story with time-stamped information, so that I could tell at a glance if anything new had happened since the last time I checked in on a story. From there, it wouldn’t be hard to offer individual RSS feeds for that category of stories, with links to the full articles for further reading.

See also: A fundamental way news sites need to change.